Attention A T users. To access the menus on this page please perform the following steps. 1. Please switch auto forms mode to off. 2. Hit enter to expand a main menu option (Health, Benefits, etc). 3. To enter and activate the submenu links, hit the down arrow. You will now be able to tab or arrow up or down through the submenu options to access/activate the submenu links.



Quick Links

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
My healthevet badge
EBenefits Badge

Dolutegravir More Effective Than Raltegravir in Treatment-Experienced Patients

for Health Care Providers

Dolutegravir More Effective Than Raltegravir in Treatment-Experienced Patients

The investigational integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has been studied in treatment-naive patients and in treatment-experienced patients with integrase inhibitor-associated resistance. The present study (SAILING) evaluates dolutegravir in 715 patients who had resistance to at least 2 ARV classes and incomplete viral suppression on their current regimen but were naive to integrase inhibitors. The patients were randomized to dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) or raltegravir (400 mg BID), each with an optimized background regimen of 2 agents (at least 1 fully active) selected by the investigators. The baseline median HIV RNA was 4.2 log10 copies/mL (30% in each arm had HIV RNA levels of >50,000 copies/mL), median CD4 count was 200 cells/µL, and 50% of the patients had resistance to at least 3 ARV classes.

At the interim 24-week analysis (intention to treat), 79% of the dolutegravir group and 70% of the raltegravir group had HIV RNA suppressed to <50 copies/mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4, 15.9; p = .003); in those with baseline HIV RNA >50,000 copies/mL, virologic suppression was seen in 70% and 63% of the treatment groups, respectively. CD4 count increases were similar in the two groups: 114 cells/µL and 106 cells/µL, respectively.

Virologic failure was seen less frequently in the dolutegravir arm (4% vs 9%), and integrase inhibitor resistance emerged less frequently in the dolutegravir arm (in 2 vs 10 subjects). The 2 subjects in the dolutegravir group developed an R263K mutation but did not have phenotypic resistance (fold change IC50 of <2 for both dolutegravir and raltegravir). On the other hand, raltegravir recipients with new integrase mutations had expected raltegravir-associated mutations (Y143, Q148, and/or N155) with high-level phenotypic resistance.

Adverse events were similar in frequency and type, though more immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) events were observed in the dolutegravir group.

Clinical Bottom Line

This study will continue through the primary endpoint of 48 weeks, so much more data on efficacy, safety, and emergent resistance should be forthcoming. Dolutegravir continues to be a very promising ARV--it is highly effective and tolerable, is dosed once daily, does not require PK boosting with ritonavir or cobicistat, and has a higher barrier to resistance than raltegravir. Approval by the FDA is anticipated to occur later this year.

Studies also will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of TAF against hepatitis B, in persons with HIV/hepatitis B coinfection--to date there are no clinical data (and subjects with hepatitis B were excluded from the study discussed here).

TAF is undergoing further investigation, including in various coformulated pills (2 Phase III studies are examining the emtricitabine/elvitegravir/cobicistat formulation studied here, and other trials are looking at different combinations).


Pozniak A, Mingrone H, Shuldyakov A, et al; SAILING study team. Dolutegravir vs raltegravir in ART-experienced, integrase-naive subjects: 24-week interim results from SAILING (ING111762). In: Program and abstracts of the 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 3-6, 2013; Atlanta. Abstract 179LB.